Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.V. Nagarathna, Ujjal Bhuyan, JJ
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Sukhwinder Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. assessment of maintainability of an appeal against high court orders. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. imposition of costs and final disposal of the matter. (Para 5 , 6) |
Delay condoned.
2. We have heard learned Additional Solicitor General for the Union of India and others.
3. We do not find any reason whatsoever to interfere with the impugned order.
4. We fail to understand as to why the Union of India and others have approached this Court by assailing the order of the Division Bench of the High Court.
5. We dismiss this Special Leave Petition with costs of Rs.25,000/-. The said costs shall be paid to the National Legal Services Authority, New Delhi within a period of three weeks from today.
6. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
