Back
Sanjay Kumar, Vipul M. Pancholi, JJ
Premal Pratap Joisher – Appellant
Versus
Vikram Jethalal Joisher – Respondent
Key Points: - Point 1 (!) - Point 2 (!) - Point 3 (!)
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of procedural history and mutation dispute context. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
O R D E R
1. Leave granted.
2. These appeals arise out of the common order dated 10.03.2026 passed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati in Writ Appeal Nos. 397 and 404 of 2025. By the said order, a division bench of the High Court allowed the appeals and set aside the order dated 24.03.2025 passed by a learned Judge of the High Court in Writ Petition No. 21407/2008.
3. The matter relates to mutation in the revenue records.
4. The first round of civil litigation between the parties apropos the prayer for a permanent injunction by Jethalal Haridas Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by DeepaJk Gougilanisher culminated in dismissal of a second appeal by the High Date: 2026.04.20
17:02:47 IST Reason:
Court on 20.11.2006, confirming the dismissal of the first appeal and of the suit, earlier thereto.
5. Thereupon, the Mandal Revenue Officer, Somandepalli Village, Anantapur District, directed amendment of the record of rights.
6. Aggrieved by the orders of the Mandal Revenue Officer, incorporating the name of Pratap C. Joisher, the father of appellant No. 1 before us, an appeal was file
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
