IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL N os.2168-2169/2 026 [Arising out of SLP (CRL) No. 3961-3962 OF 2026]

SACHIN YADAV …APPELLANT VERSUS STATE (NCT of DELHI) & ANR. …RESPONDENTS

O R D E R

1. The High Court of Delhi by a common impugned judgment and order dated 02^nd May, 2026 disposed of Bail Application No.1345/2025 & Crl. M.A. No.13482/2025. A part of the said order is under challenge in these appeals at the instance of the appellant-accused.

2. While granting the appellant’s prayer for release on bail with certain conditions, the High Court imposed the following condition:

“22. …

d. The applicant shall not reside in the same building as the complainant. The applicant shall provide the address where he would be residing after his release and shall not change the address without informing the concerned IO/SHO.

…”.

This condition is challenged by the appellant as violative of his Signature Not Verified rights guaranteed by Articles 21 and 19 of the Constitution.

rashmi dhyani pant Date: 2026.05.02 Reason:

3. Appellant figures as an accused in FIR No. 109 dated 18th February, 2025 registered at Police Station Hauz Khas. The FIR, registered at the inst