Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Sanjay Karol, Augustine George Masih, JJ
Sujal Vishwas Attavar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent
Key Points: - Point 1 (!) - Point 2 (!) - Point 3 (!) - Point 4 (!) - Point 5 (!)
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. case history involving property disputes and high court's initial direction for fir registration. (Para 2) |
| 2. exhaustion of statutory remedies is a prerequisite for writ jurisdiction. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. writ jurisdiction cannot bypass mandated statutory criminal investigative procedures. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. order setting aside high court directions and quashing the resultant fir. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
SANJAY KAROL, J.
Leave Granted.
2.
The appellant(s) have preferred the present appeal(s)
Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by RAJNI MUKHI Date: 2026.05.04 against the impugned interim order dated 17.12.2025 passed by Reason:
the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition No.5154 of 2025, whereby the High Court had directed the police to record the statement of Director, Mrs. Asha Shivajirao Sanap, of E & G Global Estates Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Complainant Company’) and initiate necessary action as per provisions of law. Pursuant to the said direction, FIR, Short for ‘First Information Report’. No.0194/2025 came to be registered against the present appellant(s).
3. Although the question raised in this appeal is one of relative simplicity
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
