Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, JJ
Kishan Chand – Appellant
Versus
Gautam Gaur Hitkarak Sabha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of facts concerning the temple management dispute and previous court findings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. analysis of the lower courts' reliance on management practices to determine ownership. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. reiteration of the legal principle that plaintiffs must independently prove title under the indian evidence act. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. final outcome of the appeal setting aside lower judgments due to failure to prove title. (Para 20 , 21) |
VIKRAM NATH, J.
1. Heard Shri Sushil Kumar Jain, learned senior counsel for the appellant, and Shri Ajay Choudhary, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The present appeal has been preferred by the appellant- defendant, Hereinafter, being referred to as “appellant-defendant”. against the final judgment dated 28th September, 2007, passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jaipur Bench, Jaipur, Hereinafter, being referred to as “High Court”., in S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 36 of 1988, whereby the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant-defendant and affirmed the judgment and decree dated 6th January, 1988, passed by the Additional District and Sess
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
