SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 1706

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Dipankar Datta, Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ
Nigam Prakash Narain – Appellant
Versus
National Medical Commission – Respondent
CIVIL APPEAL NO. OF 2026



A disciplinary authority violates natural justice by punishing a delinquent on a charge not originally framed without issuing a fresh show-cause notice. However, where misconduct is admitted, the court may exercise extraordinary powers to modify the penalty to ensure complete justice, considering the passage of time.

Headnote:(A) Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics Regulations - Disciplinary proceedings - Principles of natural justice - Requirement of fresh show-cause notice when changing the nature of the charge - Failure to disclose prior employment in faculty declaration form - Misconduct - Quantum of punishment - Exercise of extraordinary powers to do complete justice.

(B) Principles of natural justice - A disciplinary authority cannot punish a delinquent on a completely different charge which was not framed in the original show-cause notice without providing a fresh opportunity to respond. (Para 12)

(C) Constitutional powers - Power to do complete justice - Where a disciplinary process suffers from procedural flaws but the underlying misconduct is admitted, the court may modify the penalty to ensure justice, considering factors like the passage of time and the age of the individual. (Para 16)

Facts of the case:
A medical professional was charged with submitting fake faculty declaration forms. The professional successfully defended the initial charge by proving absence during the inspection. The regulatory body subsequently shifted the charge to non-disclosure of prior employment in the declaration form without issuing a fresh notice. The professional was penalized with removal from the medical register for three months.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the disciplinary authority violated the principles of natural justice by punishing the professional on a new charge without a fresh show-cause notice. However, the court also noted that the professional failed to justify the mis-declaration, which amounted to misconduct.

Issues: Whether the disciplinary authority was justified in punishing the professional on a charge not originally framed, and whether the penalty imposed was proportionate.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that while the disciplinary authority erred by failing to issue a fresh show-cause notice for the new charge, the professional's failure to explain the mis-declaration warranted disciplinary action. Exercising extraordinary powers, the court reduced the penalty to a censure to ensure complete justice.

Result: Appeal allowed; penalty reduced to censure.

Table of Content
1. factual history regarding faculty declaration and subsequent disciplinary proceedings. (Para 2 , 3)
2. dispute over the validity of declarations and adherence to natural justice. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. violation of natural justice by punishing for a charge not originally framed. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. exercise of article 142 powers to modify disproportionate professional censure. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)

DIPANKAR DATTA, J.

1. Leave granted.

THE APPEAL

2. The present appeal stems from a judgment and order dated 24th August 2023 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna, Digitally signed by in L.P.A. No. 1608 of 2017, whereby the Division Bench, in exercise of its intra-

Signature Not Verified JATINDER KAUR Date: 2026.05.06 Reason:

1 High Court

court appellate jurisdiction, allowed the appeal preferred by the Medical Council of India, MCI (since substituted by the National Medical Commission, NMC) and set aside the judgment and order dated 20th September 2017 passed by the Single Judge in C.W.J.C. No. 13547 of 2016, thereby restoring the order of penalty dated 21st July 2016 passed by the Ethics Committee of the MCI, Ethics Committee, which had directed removal of the name of Dr. Nigam Prakash Narain, Dr. Narain from the Indian Medical Register for a period of three months. The challenge to such judgment and order is at the instance of Dr. Narain.

FACTUAL MATRIX

3. Facts giving rise to the lis are as follows:

3.1. Dr. Narain is a paediatrician. He holds a Ph.D. in Paediatrics and M.R.C.P. from the Royal College of Physicians, London, and has been registered as a medical practitioner with the Bihar Council of Medical Registration since the year 1976. He served as a faculty member in the Department of Paediatrics, Patna Medical College, Patna, PMC since 1985, attaining the position of Professor and Head of the Department of Paediatrics from which he superannuated on 30th September 2014. 3.2. Post his retirement from the PMC, Dr. Narain was appointed as Professor, Department of Paediatrics, at Shridev Suman Subharti

Medical College & Hospital, Dehradun, SSSMC on 3rd January 2015, vide appointment letter bearing Ref. No. JNSCT/2015/01/1596. Pursuant to this appointment, on 22nd January 2015, an MCI inspection was conducted at the SSSMC, wherein Dr. Narain appeared as faculty of the said institution before the Inspecting Team of the MCI.

3.3. In the meanwhile, Dr. Narain received an offer to rejoin the PMC as Professor on a non-cadre post of Professor on contractual basis. Accordingly, Dr. Narain submitted his resignation to the SSSMC vide letter dated 6th April 2015 and stood formally relieved from service vide relieving certificate dated 7th April 2015, Bearing Ref. No. JNSCT/2014/04/310. On the very same date, i.e., 6th April 2015, the Bihar Government, Health Department, issued a notification for the contractual appointment of Dr. Narain at the PMC. Dr. Narain joined the PMC on contractual basis on 10th April 2015, in pursuance of the office order of even date issued by the Principal, PMC. 3.4. Prior to the seed of the lis, i.e., the surprise inspection scheduled to be conducted by the MCI at the PMC on 5th May 2015, Dr. Narain had, on 21st April 2015, signed a Declaration Form (which was co- signed by the Head of the Department, Paediatrics, and the Principal of the PMC on 27th April 2015) and left the same with the Principal for safekeeping, to be produced before the Assessors of the MCI at the time of the surprise inspection. It is the admitted position that the said Declaration Form did not contain any mention of Dr. Narain’s short stint at the SSSMC during the same academic year.

3.5. On 5th May 2015, the MCI conducted a surprise inspection at the PMC. Dr. Narain, however, was not present in the country on the date of the inspection. He had applied for and granted Ex-India leave for six days from 4th May 2015 to 9th May 2015, to attend the 48th Annual Meeting of the European Society for Paediatric Gastroen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top