Back
J.K. Maheshwari, Atul S. Chandurkar, JJ
R. Ganesh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural background and the lower court's misinterpretation of the relevant cr.p.c. provision. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. distinction between section 294 and 296 cr.p.c. regarding documentary evidence management. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
O R D E R
1) Leave Granted.
2) The appellant has preferred this appeal being aggrieved by order dated 28.11.2025 passed by the High Court of Madras of Madurai Bench dismissing Criminal Revision, Digitally signed by filed by him against order dated 13.10.2025 passed by III Additional District Judge, Tiruchirappalli, rejecting his petition2 under Section 294 Cr.P.C., Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 during pendency of the Criminal Appeal.
3) For the purpose of referring to the nature of the finding and the manner in which the finding has Signature Not Verified NIDHI AHUJA Date: 2026.05.06 Reason:
been recorded by the High Court, it is necessary to refer to paragraphs 5 and 6 of the order impugned:
“5. Section 294 Cr.PC contemplates that where any document is filed before any Court by the prosecution or the accused, the particulars of every such document shall be included in a list and the parti
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
