Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Dipankar Datta, Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ
Jyoti Rani – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
Key Points: - The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the High Court’s discretion in refusing bail, and the special leave petition was dismissed. (!) - The order states that the court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment and order of the High Court rejecting the petitioner’s bail application. (!) - Pending interlocutory applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (!)
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dismissal of petition against refusal of bail. (Para 1 , 2) |
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
1. We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment and order of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh rejecting the petitioner’s application for bail; hence, the special leave petition is dismissed.
2. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
