STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MR. NARESH KATYAL, MR. SURESH CHANDER KAUSHIK, JJ
SAMSUNG INDIA ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
SURBIR SINGH AND OTHERS – Respondent
ORDER
NARESH KATYAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
Challenge in this Appeal No.381 of 2021 has been invited by appellant/OP No. 2 against order dated 02.11.2021 passed by learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-Ambala (In short “District Consumer Commission”) in complaint case No.243 of 2020, vide which complainant’s complaint has been allowed.
2. Factual matrix: Complainant purchased Samsung Mobile i.e. SM-F900F/DS Galaxy Fold Black-Samsung, IMEI No. 354261100508282 from OP No.1-M/s Savex Technologies Pvt. Ltd., vide invoice No.CHDRI1920100441 dated 23.10.2019 for Rs.1,64,999/-. It was having warranty of one year. OP No.1 is distributor of OP No.2 which is manufacturer/appellant herein and OP No.3 is customer care centre of OP No.2. As per plea; from very beginning of purchase, there was problem in network, software in subject mobile phone, but OPs despite repeated repairs have/had failed to rectify the same. Complainant continued contacting/requesting OPs through its care customer. OPs have/had given complaint numbers of complaints i.e.2285179804 dated 22.09.2020, 2285394717 dated 24.09.2020, 2285425390 dated 24.09.2020, 2286511983 dated 05.10.2020, to complainant, but to no effe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.