STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Anisha Khatoon – Appellant
Versus
Secretary Rourkela Development Authority – Respondent
Order
C.D.12 OF 2005,C.D.13/2005,C.D.15/2005 C.D.16/2005,C.D.17/2005 and C.D.19/2005 Heard learned counsel for the parties. All above complaint cases having similar issue are taken up by passing this common order. These complaints are filed U/S-17 of erstwhile Consumer Protection Act,1986(Here-in-after after called the Act).
FACTS:-
2. The concepts of case of the complainant is that the complainants were occupying the land at Nala Road. The District authorities of Sundargarh, Rourkella Development Authority and the SAIL in order to safeguard the lives of the complainants approached the complainants to rehabilitate them in pucca houses under Jawahar Nagar Housing Scheme, Nala Road which is affordable by them. On the otherhand, they proposed to allot above pucca house flats equivalent to the area occupied at Nala Road after being evacuated from the previous place on payment of reasonable price.
OP promised to provide road, electricity, sewerage, community centre etc. in the flats.
3. It is alleged inter-alia by complainants that in 1989 the brochure was issued by the OP comprising of three kinds of houses LIG-I, LIG-II & MIG-I with different plinth areas and the cost of the house. The com
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.