SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 400

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Shri Deepak Gohil – Appellant
Versus
The Mobile Store & Other 2 – Respondent


Order

ORAL ORDER

(Dated:- 11th March, 2020)

Per – Hon’ble Justice Shri A. P. Bhangale, President We have heard the Appellant/Complainant in person and learned counsel Adv.

Rahul S. Gandhi on behalf of the Respondent No.3 at length. Nobody was present on behalf of other Respondents when the matter was heard. We have also perused the material placed on record.

[2] By the present appeal, the Appellant (original Complainant) has questioned the legality of impugned judgment and order dated 07/03/2015 passed by the learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Pune; dismissing Consumer Complaint No.114 of 2014.

[3] In brief, it is the case of the Appellant/Complainant that, he had bought one APPLE iPhone 4S mobile handset for an amount of Rs.44,500/- from the Respondent No.1, The Mobile Store, having address at Chandan Nagar, Pune together with extended warranty policy from the Respondent No.4, United India Insurance Company Limited and as per the warranty clause and as per the trade policy of the Respondent No.3, Apple Company, in case of any defect in the said mobile phone, it was to be replaced immediately. Service Report No.4677 dated 28/08/2013 prepared by Unicorn Infosolutions Pvt.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top