SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 180

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Sri. B. Sudheendra Kumar, CJ, Sri. Ajith Kumar D., J, Sri. K.R. Radhakrishnan, M
Aarviyem Trading Company Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Girish Bhat – Respondent
Revision Petition | SC/32/RP/30/2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: C. Anil Kumar, Shahna Karthikeyan
For the Respondents: G.S. Kalkura

The petitioners may renew their claims before the District Commission after dismissal as withdrawn.

Headnote:In this matter concerning consumer disputes, the revision petitioners, substitutive parties in the business context, sought relief against the respondent. The court determined that the case was dismissed as withdrawn, allowing for the petitioners to rekindle their claims in the District Commission. The court emphasized their right to raise relevant contentions subsequently.

Result: The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

ORDER

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REVISION PETTITION No. 30/2022 ORDER DATED: 02.07.2025 (Against the order in I.A.No.06/2022 in C.C.No.13/2018 on the files of DCDRC, Kasaragod)

PRESENT:

HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. B. SUDHEENDRA : PRESIDENT KUMAR SRI. AJITH KUMAR D. : JUDICIAL MEMBER SRI. K.R. RADHAKRISHNAN : MEMBER REVISION PETITIONERS:

1. The Authorised Signatory, Aarviyem Trading Company, K.K. Road, Perla P.O., Manjeshwar Taluk, Kasaragod – 671 552

2. The Manager, Rohini Copra Cakes, Ananth Oil Extractions (P) Ltd., VRM Road, Ravipuram, Cochin – 682 016 (by Adv. C. Anil Kumar and Adv. Shahna Karthikeyan)

Vs.

RESPONDENT:

Girish Bhat, S/o Krishna Bhat, Balenoole, Katukukke Village, Balemoole P.O., Manjeshwar Taluk, Kasaragod – 671 552 (By Adv. G.S. Kalkura)

ORDER

HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI.B.SUDHEENDRAKUMAR:PRESIDENT Dismissed as withdrawn in view of the endorsement made in this regard by the learned counsel for the revision petitioners on the memorandum of revision petition. However, we make it clear that the revision petitioners shall be at liberty to raise all their contentions, including the contentions which have been already taken in this revision petition, before the District Commission at the appropriate stage. If the revision petitioners take any such contention, the District Commission shall consider the said contentions, in accordance with law, at the time of disposing of the complaint.

JUSTICE B. SUDHEENDRA : PRESIDENT KUMAR AJITH KUMAR D. : JUDICIAL MEMBER K.R. RADHAKRISHNAN : MEMBER SL/jb ..................

SRI.B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR PRESIDENT ..................

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top