Back
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, CJ, MS. PINKI, J
MRS. VEENA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
M/S. SCANDIA MOTORCARS PVT. LTD. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. reliefs sought by the complainant. (Para 1) |
| 2. details of the car purchase and breakdowns. (Para 2) |
| 3. opposite party no. 1's defense and allegations. (Para 3) |
| 4. opposite party no. 2's defense and misjoinder. (Para 4) |
| 5. no rejoinder filed by complainant. (Para 5) |
| 6. evidence considered. (Para 6) |
| 7. written arguments and cited judgments. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 8. hearing and record review. (Para 10) |
| 9. key issue for consideration. (Para 12) |
| 10. definition of deficiency in the consumer protection act. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 11. need for expert report to prove manufacturing defect. (Para 15 , 17 , 18) |
| 12. final judgment and order. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
1. The present Complaint has been filed before this Commission by the Complainant alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of Opposite Party No. 1 to 6 and have prayed for the following reliefs:-
ii. Direct the Defendants to pay damages amounting to Rs. 10,00,000/- for the negligence on and for jeopardizing the life and limb of the Complainant, breaching contractual duties, deficiency in services, involving in unfair trade practices for falsely representing that the services are of a particular standard, quality
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
