SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 508

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
AJAI KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, PRESIDENT, SUDHA UPADHYAY, MEMBER
MOHD. AKIL ALAM – Appellant
Versus
AMAZON RETAIL INDIA PVT. LTD. – Respondent
FIRST APPEAL NO. SC/9/FA/948/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: MAHTAB AHMD
For the Respondents: None

The dismissal of a consumer complaint without hearing violates principles of natural justice, necessitating restoration of the case for adjudication on merits.

Headnote:(A) Consumer Protection Act, 2019 - Principles of Natural Justice - The complaint was dismissed for default without hearing the appellant, causing mental and financial loss. The court emphasized the necessity to afford an opportunity to the appellant, ensuring fair hearing principles are upheld. (Paras 5-7)

(B) Appeal - The bench decided that the appeal should be allowed, with the previous order being set aside for lack of a fair decision on merits, remanding it back to the lower court for proper adjudication. (Paras 8, 9)

Facts of the case:
The appellant’s complaint against the respondent was dismissed in default without a fair hearing, prompting the appeal to seek a decision on merits.

Findings of Court:
The court found merit in the appellant’s arguments about violation of natural justice and determined that the lower court should readdress the case.

Issues: The principle of fair hearing in a consumer dispute and the impact of default dismissal on the appellant’s rights.

Ratio Decidendi: The appeal was upheld to ensure that the appellant is granted a final opportunity to present their case, restoring the complaint for a fair hearing as prescribed by law.

Result: The appeal is allowed, and the complaint is remanded to the lower court.

(Delivered by Hon’ble Smt. Sudha Upadhyay, Member

1- Heard Sri A.K. Zaidi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant and perused the entire record.

2- This appeal has been filed by the appellant against the order dated 2.4.2025 passed by the learned District Consumer Commission-I, Agra in complaint case no.271 of 2024, Mohd. Akil Alam vs. Amazon Retail India Pvt. Ltd. whereby the aforesaid complaint was dismissed in default of the appellant/ complainant.

3- Since the complaint has been dismissed by means of the impugned order in default of the appellant, therefore, in view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to the respondent is hereby dispensed with.

4- Accordingly, the instant appeal is proposed to be disposed of finally at the stage of admission.

5- Learned counsel for the appellant argues that the impugned order has caused great mental and financial loss to the appellant as the complaint has not been decided on merit. No opportunity of hearing was afforded to the present appellant. It has further resulted in miscarriage of justice and there has been violation of principal of natural justice, therefore, it is fit case for interference by this Commission. Therefore, he prays that the impugned judgment and order dated 2.4.2025 passed in complaint case no.271 of 2024 deserves to be set aside and the matter deserves to be remanded to the learned District Commission for its decision on merits.

6- Having heard the submission of learned counsel for the appellant and upon perusal of entire record and without expressing any opinion on merits of the complaint case no.271 of 2024, only with a view to afford a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the appellant, the bench is of considered view that the appellant/complainant should be given a last opportunity to appear before the learned District Commission to pursue his complaint case in accordance with law for disposal of the complaint case no.271 of 2024 on merits.

7- For the aforesaid over all reasons, the appeal deserves to be allowed. The impugned order dated 2.4.2025 deserves to be set aside and the matter deserves to be remanded to the learned District Commission for its disposal afresh on merits.

ORDER

8- The appeal is allowed. The impugned judgment and order dated 2.4.2025 passed by the learned District Consumer Commission-1, Agra in complaint case no.271 of 2024 is set aside and the case is remanded to the learned District Consumer Commission concerned with the direction to restore the complaint to its original number and to decide the complaint afresh after affording the opportunity to both the parties, in accordance with law.

9- The appellant/complainant shall appear before the District Consumer Commission concerned on 18.8.2025 positively without seeking any unnecessary adjournment. He shall also cooperate in getting the complaint case no.271 of

2024 decided expeditiously.

10- The learned District Consumer Commission shall also put the respondent/opposite party of complaint case no.271 of 2024 to notice before proceeding further.

11- Let copy of this order be made available to the parties as per rules.

12- Let this order be uploaded on website of this Commission at the earliest.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top