STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Naresh Katyal, Suresh Chander Kaushik, JJ
Harpal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Lotus Realtech Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. failure to meet construction deadlines. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. agreement terms indicate obligation to refund. (Para 3) |
| 3. court orders timely refund with interest. (Para 4) |
ORDER
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA Date of Institution: 03.09.2023/05.09.2023 Date of Final Hearing: 27.05.2025 Date of Pronouncement: 13.06.2025 Consumer Complaint No.31 of 2023 Harpal Singh S/o Sewa Ram, R/o Flat No. 44, Sidharth Apartments, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi-110087. .....Complainant Versus Lotus Realtech Pvt. Ltd. C-501, Court Yard Nirvana Country, Sector-50, Gurugram (Haryana)-122001 through its Manager/Authorized Signatory/Officer-in-
charge/Director Sales & Marketing.
...Opposite Party CORAM: Sh. Naresh Katyal, Judicial Member.
Sh. S.C. Kaushik, Member.
Argued by:- None for complainant.
Mr. Jagbir Singh Dahiya, counsel for opposite party.
ORDER
NARESH KATYAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER:-
OP developed residential Group Housing Project under the name and style of “Lotus Elise” at Sector-99, Gurugram. Complainant had booked one apartment in said project on 28.03.2012 by paying Rs.5.00 lacs. He also paid Rs.10.00 lacs on 20.07.2013 and Rs.6.00 lacs on 25.07.2013. OP allotted 3 BH
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.