Back
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Justice S.P.Tavade, CJ, Vijay C.Premchandani, J
Mr.Vinod Muktinath Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Mr.Jayvant Vasant Thorve – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initiation of appeal in consumer protection cases. (Para 1) |
| 2. criminal procedures applicable to consumer protection orders. (Para 2 , 6 , 7 , 9) |
| 3. arguments regarding procedural adherence in appeals. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 4. observation on the required adherence to procedural norms. (Para 5 , 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. final conclusion directing a proper trial process. (Para 12 , 13) |
ORDER
(Dt.19/06/2025)
Per Hon’ble Vijay C.Premchandani – Member
1. The present appellant has filed this first appeal against the order dated 08/02/2022 passed by the Ld.Additional District Consumer Commission, Mumbai Suburban at Bandra in Execution Application no.EA/14/64 in Consumer Complaint no.CC/05/468. It is contended in the appeal that in Execution Application No.EA/14/64, the impugned order was passed, thereby convicting the present appellant u/sec.27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 for a period of two years and directed to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- as fine. Being aggrieved with the said order/judgment, the present appellant approached to this Commission by filing the present appeal u/sec.27-A of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 . The appellant has contended that the aforesaid execution applicati
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
