Back
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Justice S.P.Tavade, CJ, Vijay C.Premchandani, J
Mr.Dinesh M.Sharma Former Director M/s.Sharma Realty Pvt.Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Mr.Ram Niwas Rai (since deceased through L.Rs) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of appeal against execution order. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments regarding procedural errors in trial. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. procedural requirements for execution applications. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. order to remand for fresh trial. (Para 13) |
Per Hon’ble Vijay C.Premchandani – Member
1. The present appellant has filed this first appeal against the order dated 08/02/2022 passed by the Ld.Additional District Consumer Commission, Mumbai Suburban at Bandra in Execution Application no.EA/14/65 in Consumer Complaint no.CC/05/470. It is contended in the appeal that in Execution Application No.EA/14/65, the impugned order was passed, thereby convicting the present appellant u/sec.27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 for a period of two years and directed to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- as fine. Being aggrieved with the said order/judgment, the present appellant approached to this Commission by filing the present appeal u/sec.27-A of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The appellant has contended that the aforesaid execution application was filed by the respondent/org.complainant for non compliance of the order passed in the consumer complaint and thereby the Ld.Dis
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
