HON'BLE MR. AJEYA MATILAL , JUDICIAL MEMBER HON'BLE MR. NITYASUNDAR TRIVEDI , MEMBER FOR THE PETITIONER:

Apple India Pvt. Ltd., Mr. Chiranjib Sinha, Ms. Chandrima Roy Chowdhury (Advocate)

DATED: 23/06/2025

ORDER

Hon'ble Mr. Ajeya Matilal, Judicial Member Ld. Counsel appearing for the Revisionist Petitioner is present.

None appears on behalf of the Respondents on call.

Being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the Order vide Order No.23 dated 02.05.2023, the Revisionist/Petitioner preferred this Revision Petition.

Heard the submission of the Ld. Counsel for the Revisionist Petitioner.

Considered.

It appears from the impugned Order that the Ld. Commission below observed “on perusal of the reply by Opposite Party Nos.1 & 2, it appears that Opposite Party has not stated his reply to the questionnaire (cross examination) on oath as required under the provision of the Indian Evidence Act ”.

Our attention was drawn to Order No.18, Rule-4 of the C.P.C 1908 .

“Recording of evidence – (1) In every case, the examination-in-chief of a witness shall be on affidavit and copies thereof shall be supplied to the Opposite Party by the party who calls him for evidence”.

Our attention was drawn to the extract co