STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, PRESIDENT, MR. J.P. AGRAWAL, MEMBER (GENERAL)
MR. RAJIV RANJAN – Appellant
Versus
M/S. MG HOUSING PVT. LTD. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The present Complaint has been filed before this Commission by the Complainant alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of Opposite Party No. 1 to 6 and have prayed for the following reliefs:-
a) To direct the opposite party no. 1 to prepare and execute the apartment buyer agreement according to annexure 'A' read with rule 8 of Haryana Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules , 2017 and execute the registration of the same under the section 13 of Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act , 2016 and the rules.
b) To direct the opposite party no. 1 to 5 to provide all facilities up to mark as promised in the agreement and brochures.
c) To direct the opposite party no 1 to 5 to provide CCTV cameras in the common areas including basement and lifts as per promise.
d) To direct Respondent no. 1 & 5 to execute the Maintenance Agreement as per applicable laws for the maintaining the facilities in the common area and Apartment of the complainants.
e) To direct the opposite party no. 1 to execute the conveyance deed in favor of the complainants after receiving balance sale price of the unit and not charge any further amount over and above the sale
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.