Back
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MR. RAJESH K. ARYA, PRESIDING MEMBER, MR. PREETINDER SINGH, MEMBER
MS. SURJIT KAUR – Appellant
Versus
MANOHAR INFRASTRUCTURE & CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the complaint (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. opposite parties' objections and defenses (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. maintainability of the consumer complaint (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. legal possession and absence of completion certificate (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. basic amenities and developer's obligations (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 6. charging maintenance fees and completion status (Para 14 , 15) |
| 7. compensation for the complainant (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 8. final orders and disposition (Para 19 , 20) |
RAJESH K. ARYA, PRESIDING MEMBER Factual scenario:-
It is the case of the complainant that despite the fact that substantial amount stood received from her by the opposite parties against the plot located in their project, details of which are given below, they (opposite parties) failed to develop the same by the committed date and in order to evade their liability, paper possession was offered to the complainant and that too in the absence of basic amenities, which is not sustainable in the eyes of law and the same is also not accompanied with completion certificate. It has been stated that even the terms and conditions contained in the agreement i.e. buyers agreement and draft maintenance agreement
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
