SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 1895

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MR.MANGESH P.GHARAT – Appellant
Versus
BANK OF INDIA THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGER MR.RAKESH KUMAR CHODHARY AND ANR – Respondent


STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI Appeal No.A/21/16 (Arising against the order dated 07/10/2019 passed by the D.F. Raigad in CC/18/620)

Mr.Mangesh Prabhakar Gharat At Post Dongari, Bokarwida ...... Appellant/org.complainant Taluka Uran, District Raigad Versus

1. Bank of India Through its Branch manager Mr.Rakesh Kumar Choudhary Having office at Koparkhairane Chaynal Classic CHSL, Shop No.34567 Plot no.91, Station Road Sector 4, Navin Mumbai 400 709 ………Respondents/org.OPs

2.Vinayak Road Builders & Developers Through Mr.Samir Yashwant Patil Ground floor, Rameshwar Apartment Alibag-Rewas Road, Vidyanagar Alibag, Distict Raigad BEFORE: Justice S.P.Tavade – President Vijay C.Premchandani – Member PRESENT: Advocate Ajay Pawar for appellant. Advocate Omkar T. Sakpal for respondent no.1 Advocate Sharmila Ghanwat for respondent no.2 FINAL ORDER (Dt.29/05/2025)

Per Hon’ble Vijay C.Premchandani – Member

1. The present appeal is filed against the impugned order dated 07/10/2019 passed by the Ld.District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Raigad at Alibag in consumer complaint no.CC/18/620.

The factual matrix:-

2. The appellant who is the original complainant is th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top