Back
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
DR. DILIP RATNANI & ANR – Appellant
Versus
RAJ PANJWANI & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. complaint regarding treatment leading to death. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. defenses against allegations of negligence. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 15) |
| 3. findings on availability of medical resources. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 18) |
| 4. judgment to allow appeal and set aside previous order. (Para 14 , 32) |
| 5. importance of patient consent and awareness in medical treatment. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 26 , 30 , 31) |
ORDER
PER: - JUSTICE GAUTAM CHOURDIYA, PRESIDENT
This appeal is filed against order dated 16.07.2024 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Durg (C.G.) (hereinafter called “District Commission” for short) in Complaint Case No.CC/2016/286 whereby the complaint was partly allowed directing the opposite parties to jointly and severally to pay the complainants/ respondent Nos.1 to 3 herein the entire amount of compensation sought by them Rs.19,00,000/- (Nineteen Lacs) with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of complaint 15.03.2016 till realization and cost of litigation Rs.15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand). The amount of compensation with interest as above received by the complainants/ respondent Nos.1 to 3 was directed to be shared equally among them.
2. Br
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
