SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 4178

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
1.M/s. Vishnu Priya Constructions – Appellant
Versus
1.Sri Nilayam – Respondent
SC/36/A/234/2019



BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.

F.A.No. 229 OF 2019 AGAINST ORDERS IN C.C.120/2015 DISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSION-III, HYDERABAD Between:

1. Smt.D.Swapna, W/o Ch.Ajmeer Reddy, Aged about 34 years, Occ.: Housewife, R/o Flat No.G4, Sree Nilayam Block-II, Mallikarjuna Nagar, Road No.3, Peerjadiguda, RR. Dist., Telangana State.

2. Sri Akuthota Srinivas, S/o Late Lingaiah, Aged about 45 years, Occu: Business, R/o Flat No.G4, Sreenilayam, Block-II, Mallikarjuna Nagar, Road No.3, Peerjadiguda, RR.Dist., Telangana State.

……..Appellants/Opposite Parties No.2 & 3 And:

1. Sri Nilayam, Block II, Flat Owners Welfare Association, Rep. by its President, Sri D.M.Ravi Kumar, S/o D.Rahavaiah, Aged about 48 years, Occ.: Police Constable, R/o Flat No. G-1, Sri Nilayam Apartments, Block-II, H.No.1-88/13/1, Plot No.’s 29,30, 31 part, Mallikarjuna Nagar, Peerzadiguda, Medchal-Malkajgiri Dist., Hyderabad 500 039.

……….Respondent No.1/Complainant

2. M/s Vishnu Priya Constructions, Rep. its Managing Partner, Sri Merugu Vasu, S/o Late Sattaiah, Aged : 52 years, Occ.: Business, R/o Flat No.201, D.No.1-7-23/7, J.S.M. Colony, Sri Nilayam, Street No.8, Opp.: Community Hall, Habsiguda, Hyderabad-500 007.

………….Respondent No.2/Opposite Party No.1 Counsel for the Appellants/Opposite Party No.2 & 3 :

Sri P.Rajasripathi Rao Counsel for the Respondent No.1/Complainant : Called absent. Counsel for the Respondent No.2/OP No.1 : M/s D.Ravi Kumar.

F.A.No. 234 OF 2019 AGAINST ORDERS IN C.C.120/2015 DISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSION-III, HYDERABAD Between:

M/s Vishnu Priya Constructions, Rep. its Managing Partner, Sri Merugu Vasu, S/o Late Sattaiah, Aged : 49 years, Occ.: Business, R/o Flat No.201, D.No.1-7-23/7,J.S.M. Colony, Sri Nilayam, Street No.8, Opp.: Community Hall, Habsiguda, Hyderabad.

………..Appellant/ Opposite Party No.1 And:

1. Sri Nilayam, Block II, Flat Owners Welfare Association, Rep. by its President, Sri V.Uma Maheshwar Reddy, S/o Sri Narasimha Reddy, (Presently Sri .D.M.Ravi Kumar, S/o D.Rahavaiah), Aged about 42 years, Occ.: Govt. Employee, R/o H.No.1-88/12/1, Mallikarjuna Nagar, Peerjadiguda, RR Dist. 500 092.

……..Respondent No.1/Complainant

2. Smt.D.Swapna, W/o Ch.Ajmeer Reddy, Aged about 34 years, Occ.: Housewife, R/o Flat No.G4, Sreenilayam Block-II, Mallikarjuna Nagar, Road No.3, Peerjadiguda, RR Dist. 500 092.

3. Sri Akuthota Srinivas, S/o Late Lingaiah, Aged about 45 years, Occu: Business, R/o H.No.1-2-606/170/1, Near Indira Park, Banda Miasamma Nagar, Hyderabad.

……..Respondent No.2 & 3/Opposite Party No.2 & 3 Counsel for the Appellant/Opposite Party No.1 : M/s D.Ravi Kumar Counsel for the Respondent No.1/Complainant : Called absent. Counsel for the Respondents/OPs 2 & 3 : Sri P.Rajasripathi Rao QUORUM :

HON’BLE SMT. MEENA RAMANATHAN, I/c PRESIDENT &

HON’BLE SRI. V.V.SESHUBABU, MEMBER – (JUDICIAL)

WEDNESDAY, THE 0 8th DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND TWENTY FIVE **********

Order : (PER HON’BLE SRI. V.V.SESHUBABU, MEMBER – JUDICIAL)

1. FA No.229/2019 & FA 234/2019 are filed by the opposite parties No.1 to 3, u/s 15 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986, aggrieved by the order of District Consumer Commission-III, Hyderabad, dated 03.04.2019 in CC 120/2015 where under the opposite parties No.1 to 3 were directed jointly and severally : (i) to pay a sum of Rs.85,045/- towards expenses incurred by the complainant Association in executing the works; (ii) The opposite party No.1 to 3 are directed jointly and severally to pay a sum of Rs.15,92,645/- towards estimate cost of painting, flooring, drainage, drinking water, electrical, lift, water tank etc., (iii) to handover the original land document other than those mentioned in Ex.B8 in respect of “Sri Nilayam Block-II, constructed on plot No.’s 29, 30, 31 and 32 part, in Survey No.43, situated at Peerzadigua Village and Gram Panchaya, Ghatkesar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, under S.R.O., Uppal and Link Documents, sanctioned plan and development agreement to the complainant Association; (iv) to pa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top