SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 4186

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
STATE BANK OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY BRANCH MANAGER – Appellant
Versus
R SUNITHA – Respondent


BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.

F.A.No. 546 OF 2023 AGAINST ORDERS IN C.C.74/2022 DISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSION, MEDAK AT SANGA REDDY Between:

State Bank of India, Represented by Branch Manager, #1-5-101/A, Market Street Branch, Narayankhed, Sangareddy District, Telangana.

……..Appellant/ Opposite Party No.1 And:

1. R.Sunitha, W/o Ravinder, Aged : 33 years, Occ.: Govt. Employee, R/o H.No.6-42, Khajapur(V), Sirgapur (M), Sanga Reddy District-502 248.

Cell No.9963844761, 9177962040.

……..Respondent No.1/Complainant 2. Flipkart Internet Private Limited, Represented by Branch Manager, Buildings Alyssa Bengonia & Clove Embassy, Tech Village, Outer Ring Road, Devarabeesanahalli Village, Bengaluru, Karnataka -560 103.

……..Respondent No.2/Opposite Party No.2 Counsel for the Appellant/Opposite Party No.1 : Party-in-person Counsel for the Respondent No.1/Complainant : Party-in-person Counsel for the Respondent No.2/Opposite Party No.2 : Called absent QUORUM :

HON’BLE SMT. MEENA RAMANATHAN, I/c PRESIDENT &

HON’BLE SRI. V.V.SESHUBABU, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

WEDNESDAY, THE 0 8th DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND TWENTY FIVE **********

Order : (PER HON’BLE SRI. V.V.SESHUB

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top