STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
STATE BANK OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY BRANCH MANAGER – Appellant
Versus
R SUNITHA – Respondent
BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.
F.A.No. 546 OF 2023 AGAINST ORDERS IN C.C.74/2022 DISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSION, MEDAK AT SANGA REDDY Between:
State Bank of India, Represented by Branch Manager, #1-5-101/A, Market Street Branch, Narayankhed, Sangareddy District, Telangana.
……..Appellant/ Opposite Party No.1 And:
1. R.Sunitha, W/o Ravinder, Aged : 33 years, Occ.: Govt. Employee, R/o H.No.6-42, Khajapur(V), Sirgapur (M), Sanga Reddy District-502 248.
Cell No.9963844761, 9177962040.
……..Respondent No.1/Complainant 2. Flipkart Internet Private Limited, Represented by Branch Manager, Buildings Alyssa Bengonia & Clove Embassy, Tech Village, Outer Ring Road, Devarabeesanahalli Village, Bengaluru, Karnataka -560 103.
……..Respondent No.2/Opposite Party No.2 Counsel for the Appellant/Opposite Party No.1 : Party-in-person Counsel for the Respondent No.1/Complainant : Party-in-person Counsel for the Respondent No.2/Opposite Party No.2 : Called absent QUORUM :
HON’BLE SMT. MEENA RAMANATHAN, I/c PRESIDENT &
HON’BLE SRI. V.V.SESHUBABU, MEMBER – (JUDICIAL)
WEDNESDAY, THE 0 8th DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND TWENTY FIVE **********
Order : (PER HON’BLE SRI. V.V.SESHUB
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.