SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 4402

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
SANAL – Appellant
Versus
C.S.I.MISSION HOSPITAL – Respondent
SC/32/CC/13/57



STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION KERALA CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. SC/32/CC/13/57 SANAL PRESENT ADDRESS - KANJIRAVILAKAM PUTHEN VEEDUKAIPPALLI ROAD,PADINJATTUMUKK,KANIYAPURAMNCDRC,KERALA.

.......Complainant(s)

Versus C.S.I.MISSION HOSPITAL PRESENT ADDRESS - RURAL HEALTH TRAINING CENTRE,C.S.I.MISSION HOSPITAL,KAZHAKUTTOMNCDRC,KERALA.

.......Opposite Party(s)

BEFORE:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SRI.B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR , PRESIDENT HON'BLE MR. SRI.AJITH KUMAR.D , JUDICIAL MEMBER SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN.K.R , MEMBER FOR THE COMPLAINANT:

NEMO FOR THE OPPOSITE PARTY:

NEMO DATED: INVALID DATETIME

ORDER

THE KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACADU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM COMPLAINT . No. 57/2013 JUDGMENT DATED. 22/01/2025 PRESENT:

HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR : PRESIDENT SRI. AJITH KUMAR. D : JUDICAL MEMBER COMPLAINANT:

Sanal, S/o . Babunathan, Kanjiravilakam puthen veedu, Kaippalli road, Padinjattumukku, Chittattumukku P.O, Kaniyapuram, Thiruvananthapuram District.

(By Madavoor . V Mohan and Adv. K. S. Vijayakumar )

V/s OPPOSITE PARTIES:

1. C S I Mission Hospital, Rural Health Training Centre, ( Dr. S.M.C.S. I. Medical college, Karakonam) Kzhakuttom, Thiruvananthapuram- 695582, Represented by its Administrative officer.

2. Dr. S.M.C.S.I. Medical College & Hospital, Karakonam, Neyyattinkara Taluk, Thiruvananthapuram, Represented by its Manager.

3. The Administrative officer, Medical College & Hospitals, Bishops house, LMS compound, Thiruvananthapuram.

JUDGMENT

SRI. AJITH KUMAR. D : JUDICAL MEMBER The complainant is absent. Notice was served on the counsel for the complainant. There is no representation for the complainant. On perusal of the proceedings paper it is seen that complainant was not present on early occasions. From the conduct of the complainant in keeping away from this Commission, it is evident that the complainant has lost interest in prosecuting the matter. In the said circumstances, we are inclined to dismiss this complaint for non prosecution. Accordingly, this complaint stands dismissed for non prosecution.

JUSTICE B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR : PRESIDENT AJITH KUMAR. D : JUDICAL MEMBER Sh/-

..................

SRI.B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR PRESIDENT ..................

SRI.AJITH KUMAR.D JUDICIAL MEMBER ..................J MEMBER

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top