SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 4475

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
1.HDFC ERGo General Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Pothukuchi Surya Annapuran Santhy Kamak – Respondent


BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.

F.A.No. 498 OF 2020 AGAINST ORDERS IN C.C.101/2018 DISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSION-III, HYDERABAD Between:

1. HDFC ERGO General Insurance Company Limited, Regd., Off. 1st Floor, 165-166, Backbay Reclamation, H.T.Parekh Marg, Churchgate, Mumbai-400 020, Rep. by its Authorized Person.

2. HDFC ERGO General Insurance Company Limited, Customer Service Office, 6th Floor, Leela Business Park, Andheri Kurla Road, Andheri (East), Mumbai-400 059.

3. HDFC ERGO General Insurance Company Limited, 4th Floor, Office No.: 401 & 402, Kuchkulla House, Himayat Nagar, Hyderabad – 500 029.

……..Appellants/ Opposite Parties And:

Mrs.Pothukuchi Surya Annapuran Santhy Kamal, W/o Venkata Srikanth, Aged : 38 years, R/o Flat No.116, D.No.2-4-907/116, Rinda Residency, New Nagole, Kothapet, Hyderabad-500 035. ……..Respondent/Complainant Counsel for the Appellants/Opposite Parties : Sri N.Srinath Rao.

Counsel for the Respondent/Complainant : M/s Singam Srinivasa Rao.

QUORUM :

HON’BLE SMT. MEENA RAMANATHAN, I/c PRESIDENT &

HON’BLE SRI. V.V.SESHUBABU, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

FRIDAY, THE 24th DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND TWENTY FIVE **********

Order : (PER H

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top