SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 4522

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
The Branch Manager Andhra Bank – Appellant
Versus
1.Sundaragiri Rajamallaiah – Respondent


BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.

F.A.No. 861 OF 2020 AGAINST ORDERS IN C.C.101/2009 DISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSION, KARIMNAGAR Between:

The Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Metpally Town and Mandal.

………..Appellant/ Opposite Party No.1 And:

1. Mr.Sundaragiri Rajamalliah, S/o Lingam, Aged : 26 years, Occ.: Labour, R/o Aathmakur Village of Metpally Mandal of Karimnagar Dist.

Now residing and working at Mascow Tech Services, LLc Post Box No.26311, Sharja, UAE, Represented by his Power of Attorney Holder, Cherlapaly Hanmandla, S/o Chinna Anjaiah, Age : 30 years, Occ.: Vegetable Market, R/o Metpally Proper & Mandal of Karimnagar District.

2. Mr.Merugu Shanker, S/o Narsa Goud, Age : 32 years, Occ.: Toddy Tapper, R/o Peddapur, V/o Korutla Maridal, Karimnagar District, Telangana.

........Respondents/Complainants No.1 & 2

3. The Branch Post Master, Peddapur Post Office, Karimnagar.

…………..Respondent No.3/OP No.2 (Respondent No.3 is not necessary party in this appeal).

Counsel for the Appellant/Opposite Party No.1 : Sri B.Praveen Kumar.

Counsel for the Respondents/Complainants No.1 & 2 :

Sri K.Narsa Goud.

For the Respondent No.3/Opposite Party No.2 :

Not necessary par

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top