STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
1.SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Mohit Kumar Jagwani – Respondent
BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.
F.A.No. 358 OF 2020 AGAINST ORDERS IN C.C.270/2016 DISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSION, RANGA REDDY Between:
SBI General Insurance Co., Ltd., Represented by its Assistant, Vice President (Health claims), Grievances Redressal Office, Natraj, 101, 201, 301, Junction of Western Express Highway and Andherin Kurla Road, Andheri East, Mumbai-500 069.
………..Appellant/ Opposite Party And:
Mohit Kumar Jagwani, S/o Satish Kumar Jagwani, Aged about 28 years, Occ.: Business, R/o Flat No.209, Sri Tirumala Harmony, Beside Saket Towers, Kapra, Ranga Reddy District.
……..Respondent/Complainant Counsel for the Appellant/Opposite Party : M/s. K.Madhusudhan Reddy Counsel for the Respondent/Complainant : Sri S.V. Suresh QUORUM :
HON’BLE SMT. MEENA RAMANATHAN, I/c PRESIDENT &
HON’BLE SRI. V.V.SESHUBABU, MEMBER – JUDICIAL WEDNESDAY, THE 14th DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND TWENTY FIVE **********
Order : PER HON’BLE SRI. V.V.SESHUBABU, MEMBER – JUDICIAL
1. The appeal is filed u/s 15 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by the Opposite Party, aggrieved by the order of District Consumer Commission, Ranga Reddy, dated 20.12.2019 in CC 270/2016, where under th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.