SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 5670

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
1.SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Mohit Kumar Jagwani – Respondent


BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.

F.A.No. 358 OF 2020 AGAINST ORDERS IN C.C.270/2016 DISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSION, RANGA REDDY Between:

SBI General Insurance Co., Ltd., Represented by its Assistant, Vice President (Health claims), Grievances Redressal Office, Natraj, 101, 201, 301, Junction of Western Express Highway and Andherin Kurla Road, Andheri East, Mumbai-500 069.

………..Appellant/ Opposite Party And:

Mohit Kumar Jagwani, S/o Satish Kumar Jagwani, Aged about 28 years, Occ.: Business, R/o Flat No.209, Sri Tirumala Harmony, Beside Saket Towers, Kapra, Ranga Reddy District.

……..Respondent/Complainant Counsel for the Appellant/Opposite Party : M/s. K.Madhusudhan Reddy Counsel for the Respondent/Complainant : Sri S.V. Suresh QUORUM :

HON’BLE SMT. MEENA RAMANATHAN, I/c PRESIDENT &

HON’BLE SRI. V.V.SESHUBABU, MEMBER JUDICIAL WEDNESDAY, THE 14th DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND TWENTY FIVE **********

Order : PER HON’BLE SRI. V.V.SESHUBABU, MEMBER JUDICIAL

1. The appeal is filed u/s 15 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by the Opposite Party, aggrieved by the order of District Consumer Commission, Ranga Reddy, dated 20.12.2019 in CC 270/2016, where under th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top