2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 5708
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
BIJU M D – Appellant
Versus
V VIJAYABHAI – Respondent
SC/32/A/207/2018
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION KERALA FIRST APPEAL NO. SC/32/A/207/2018 BIJU M D PRESENT ADDRESS - KOTTAYAM DISTRICT SURVAY AND LAND RECORDS EMPLOYEES CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.K. 350, KOTTAYAM- 686587. ,KERALA.
.......Appellant(s)
Versus V VIJAYABHAI PRESENT ADDRESS - JAYASREE HOUSE, MALLOOSSERY.P.O, 686041. ,KERALA.
.......Respondent(s)
BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SRI.B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR , PRESIDENT HON'BLE MR. SRI.AJITH KUMAR.D , JUDICIAL MEMBER FOR THE APPELLANT:
NEMO FOR THE RESPONDENT:
NEMO DATED: 19/05/2025
ORDER
KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM APPEAL No. 207/2018 JUDGMENT DATED: 19.05.2025 (Against the Order in C.C. 182/2015 of DCDRC, Kottayam)
PRESENT:
HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR : PRESIDENT SRI. AJITH KUMAR D. : JUDICIAL MEMBER APPELLANTS:
1. Biju M.D., S/o Divakaran (Former President, Kottayam District Survey and Land Records Employees Co-operative Society Ltd., K. 350, Kottayam, residing at Mundtharappel House, Vayala P.O., Kadaplamattom, Kottayam-686 587.
2. P.K. Sadanandan, S/o Kunjappy, (Former Director Board Member), Kottayam District Survey and Land Records Employees Co-operative Society Ltd., K. 350, Kottayam, residing at Pulayaparambil House, Manganam P.O., Vijayapuram, Kottayam District-686 018.
3. A. Abdul Majeed, S/o Abu Becker, (Former Director Board Member), Kottayam District Survey and Land Records Employees Co-operative Society Ltd., K. 350, Kottayam, residing at Kappi Veedu, Fathimapuram P.O., Vazhapally West Village, Changanassery, Kottayam-686 102.
(By Adv. G.K. Sudheer and Adv. P. Raj Mohan)
Vs.
RESPONDENTS:
1. V. Vijayabhai, Jayasree House, Malloossery P.O., Pin Code-686 041.
(By Adv. D.R. Rajesh)
2. Kottayam District Survey and Land Records Employees Co-operative Society Ltd.
represented by its Secretary, now represented by Administrator (Part Time), Kottayam Unit Inspector, Assistant Registrar (General) of Co-operative Societies Kottayam, Nagambadam.
3. Kottayam District Survey and Land Records Employees Co-operative Society Ltd.
represented by its President, now represented by Administrator (Part Time), Kottayam Unit Inspector, Assistant Registrar (General) of Co-operative Societies Kottayam, Nagambadam.
4. A.M. Santha Kumari, W/o Mohanan (Former Vice President), Kottayam District Survey and Land Records Employees Co-operative Society Ltd. K. 350, Kottayam, residing at Kotteparambil House, Aymanam P.O., Kottayam-686 015.
5. Manju Gopalan, W/o Vipin M. Raj, (Former Director Board Member), Kottayam District Survey and Land Records Employees Co-operative Society Ltd., K. 350, Kottayam, residing at Chooranickel House, Amayanoor P.O., Ayarkunnam Village, Kottayam-686 587.
(By Adv. S. Narayanan Nair and M.A. Vahab for R4 and R5)
JUDGMENT
HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR : PRESIDENT The appellants are the opposite parties 3, 5 and 6 in C.C. No. 182/2015 on the files of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kottayam (for short, “the District Commission”).
2. The complainant was maintaining a savings bank account in Kottayam District Survey and Land Records Employees Co-operative Society Ltd. The complainant also joined a group deposit scheme and deposited various amounts under the said scheme as fixed deposit. The opposite parties are liable to pay a total amount of Rs. 8,68,493/- (Rupees Eight Lakh Sixty Eight Thousand Four Hundred and Ninety Three only) to the complainant. However, when demanded, the amount was not refunded by the opposite parties. In the said circumstances, the complainant filed the above complaint alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties.
3. The opposite parties 1 and 2 did not file version within the statutory period. The other opposite parties did not file any version at all.
4. Before the District Commission, the complainant filed proof affidavit.
Exhibits A1 to A3 were also marked for the complainant. No evidence was adduced by the opposite parties. After evaluating the evidence, t