Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 5902

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
SRI.B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, PRESIDENT, SRI.AJITH KUMAR.D, JUDICIAL MEMBER, SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN.K.R, MEMBER
Appario Retail Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Shiburaj – Respondent
REVISION PETITION NO. SC/32/RP/50/2024

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Prince Pawaiya, Maneesha Kumar
For the Respondents:

Judicial review of a dismissal is justified when procedural adherence is established.

Headnote:This order pertains to Revision Petition No. SC/32/RP/50/2024 in the Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission concerning an appeal against the dismissal of prior motions. Facts show that the petition was submitted by Appario Retail Private Limited against Shiburaj and others. The court found the dismissal justified based on the context of the initial complaint. Issues concerned the validity of previous orders and the role of the parties involved. The court reasoned that procedural adherence justified the dismissed motions.

Result: the revision petition is dismissed.

Table of Content
1. nature of the revision petition and its parties. (Para 3)
2. observations on procedural grounds for dismissal. (Para 4 , 5)

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SRI.B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR , PRESIDENT HON'BLE MR. SRI.AJITH KUMAR.D , JUDICIAL MEMBER SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN.K.R , MEMBER FOR THE PETITIONER:

NEMO FOR THE RESPONDENT:

NEMO DATED: 18/06/2025

ORDER

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM I REVISION PETTITION No.50/2024 ORDER DATED : 18.06.2025 (Against the order in C.C.No.277/2020 on the files of DCDRC, Ernakulam)

PRESENT:

HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. B. SUDHEENDRA : PRESIDENT KUMAR SRI. AJITH KUMAR D. : JUDICIAL MEMBER SRI. K.R. RADHAKRISHNAN : MEMBER REVISION PETITIONERS:

1. Appario Retail Private Limited, Registered Office at S-405, LGF, Greater Kailash – II, New Delhi – 110 048 th th

2. Corporate Office at 5 & 6 Floor, 1 Sobha, No. 50, St. Marks Road, Bangalore – 560 001, Karnataka (by Advs. Prince Pawaiya & Maneesha Kumar)

Vs.

RESPONDENTS:

1. Shiburaj, Mandothum Moolayil, Vyshali Road, Pukkattupady, Ernakulam – 683 561(Address in ID Proof : Mandothumoolayil House Nellimattom P.O., Kavalandad, Ernakulam – 686 693 th

2. Amazon Seller Services Pvt. Ltd., Registered Office at 8 Floor, Brigade Gateway 26/1, Dr Rajkumar Road, Bangalore, Karnataka –

560 055 th

3. Amazon Retail India Pvt. Ltd., Registered Office : Block E, 14 Floor, Unit No.1401 to 1421, International Trade Tower, Nehru Place, New th Delhi, South Delhi – 110 019 Corporate Office : 18 Floor, Brigade, Gateway 26/1, Dr. Rajkumar Road, Bangalore, Karnataka – 560 055

4. Amazon Godown, Eroor, Arakkakadavu, Vennala High School Road, Opposite Vennala Muslim Jama-athth, Vadakkaneth Pali, Kochi, Kerala – 682 028

5. Mahindra Logistics Ltd., Kaniyodikal House, Choondy, Near SOS Children’s Village, Erumathala, P.O. Aluva, Ernakulam

O R D E R

SRI. AJITH KUMAR D. : JUDICIAL MEMBER In view of the dismissal of I.A.No.889/2024, the revision petition is also dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 5902

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONSRI.B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, PRESIDENT, SRI.AJITH KUMAR.D, JUDICIAL MEMBER, SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN.K.R, MEMBERAppario Retail Private Limited – AppellantVersusShiburaj – RespondentREVISION PETITION NO. SC/32/RP/50/2024

Judicial review of a dismissal is justified when procedural adherence is established.

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
SRI.B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, PRESIDENT, SRI.AJITH KUMAR.D, JUDICIAL MEMBER, SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN.K.R, MEMBER
Appario Retail Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Shiburaj – Respondent
REVISION PETITION NO. SC/32/RP/50/2024