Per Milind S.Sonawane, Hon’ble Presiding Member.

The respondents are the legal heirs of deceased Neha and have filed Consumer Complaint No.19/2023 before the Ld. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Jalna ( The District Commission’ for short). In that matter the respondents are the original complainants and the revision petitioners are the original opponents. Both the parties before the Ld. District Commission have filed their evidence and the matter is adjourned for the oral argument of the parties. Meanwhile the revision petitioners filed an application for praying the District Commission that, though their evidence has been closed but they wish to cross examine Dr.A.V.Bhosale the Civil Surgeon, Jalna and on whose report and evidence the respondents have relied .

2. That application obviously has been opposed by the respondents by stating that the application is filed at a belated stage. There are various reports alleging the negligence on the part of revision petitioners. They are trying to protract the matter unnecessarily. On hearing both sides the District Commission dismissed that application on the ground that, the proceeding before it under S.35 of Consumer Prot