SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 6334

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
KALYANI KAPSE, PRESIDING MEMBER, SHAILA D. WANDHARE, MEMBER
ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
PRAGYA WD/O PRADIP SIRAS – Respondent
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. SC/CB2/27/MA/23/75|SC/CB2/27/A/23/104|CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO.CC/133/2019



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: C.A. ANTHONY
For the Respondents: NONE

The actual delay in filing an appeal was found to be 4 days, justifying the application for condonation of delay under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

Headnote:The judgment deals with an application for condonation of delay under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The court finds that while the applicant contended the delay was 21 days, the actual delay was only 4 days. The appeal was thus allowed in interest of justice. The applicant's request was supported by procedural explanations from the appellant company and as such the court was inclined to grant the request for condonation. The final order allowed the delay application and set an adjourned date for admission hearing.

Table of Content
1. filing an appeal and request for delay condonation. (Para 1 , 2)
2. response and acknowledgment of intimation. (Para 3)
3. contention regarding responsibility for delay. (Para 4)
4. assessment of delay and justification for condonation. (Para 5)

ORDER

1. Applicant namely Oriental Insurance company Ltd. Chandrapur filed the instant appeal alongwith application for condonation of delay against the order and judgement dated 6/2/2023 passed by Ld.District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chandrapur in consumer Complaint No.CC/133/2019.

2. Applicant, in his application contended that due to procedural formalities of the appellant company the delay has been caused in preferring appeal. It is contended that intimation of order was communicated by the dealing advocate to the Branch Office in the third week of February,2023. The Branch Office after receipt of certified copy in the first week of March,2023, forwarded the office record alongwith order to the Divisional Office at Nagpur. Thereafter it was sent tothe Regional Office to take decision whether to satisfy the award or to prefer an appeal. Applicant further contended that if the delay caused in preferring appeal is not condoned the appellant would be denied the opportunity to contest the matter on merits. Hence the delay of 21 days may be kindly condoned.

3. Notice was issued to the Respondent namely Pradnya Siras. Non applicant filed reply on 7/2/2024.

4. We heard Adv.C.A.Anthony for the applicant. No one appeared for the non applicant. In reply, non applicant stated that it is denied that the intimation of the order was communicated by the dealing advocate to the branch office in the third week of February,2023. Non applicant specifically contended that every order of DCDRC, Chandrapur was in the knowledge of counsel for applicant and it was his responsibility to communicate it to the Regional Office of the Applicant.

5. We have carefully gone through the application for condonation of delay as well as reply filed on it. We have observed that the impugned order and judgement was passed by DCDRC,Chandrapur on 6/2/2023 in consumer complaint No.CC/133/2019 U/s 12 of the Consumer Protection Act ,1986. Intimation of the order was received in the third week of February,2023 and certified copy of the impugned oder was received in the first week of March,2023 and the appeal was filed on 5/4/2023. Though the applicant has contended that there is a delay of 21 days, the actual delay is only of 4 days. Hence we are inclined to condone the delay in the interest of justice. Hence we pass the following order.

ORDER

1. Application for condonation of delay is hereby allowed.

2. No order as to cost.

3. Adjourned for admission hearing to 18/09/2025.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top