Back
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Justice S.P.Tavade, President, Vijay C.Premchandani, Member
M/s.Universal Sompo General Insurance Co.Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Mr.Babusab I.Arallgid – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. legal obligations of policyholders in notifying insurance companies. (Para 1 , 7 , 9) |
| 2. timely notification to police suffices for insurance claims. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court emphasis on consumer rights and liberal interpretation. (Para 4 , 10) |
| 4. delay should not invalidate genuine claims. (Para 5 , 6 , 8) |
2nd floor, ITC Industrial Area MIDC Mahape, Navi Mumbai 400 710 ...... Appellant/org.OP Versus Mr.Babusab I.Arallgid R/at 16, Shalimar Apartments Behnd Shell Petrol Pump ………Respondent/org.complainant Munshi Compound, Kashimira Thane 401 107 BEFORE: Justice S.P.Tavade – President Vijay C.Premchandani – Member PRESENT: Adv.Yashika S. Jain h/f. Adv.Kalpana Trivedi for appellant.
Adv.Mahesh D. Sahasrabuddhe present for respondent.
ORDER (Dt.01/08/2025)
Per Hon’ble Justice S.P.Tavade – President
1. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order passed by the Ld.Additional Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Thane, in consumer complaint no.CC/RBT/224/2015, the original opponent has filed the present appeal. It is contended that the complaint filed by the respondent was allowed and the present appellant was directed to pay a sum of Rs.4,25,000/- towards the reimbursement o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
