Back
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Justice Ajai Kumar Srivastava, PRESIDENT, Mrs. Sudha Upadhyay, MEMBER
Intercity Smart Bus & Others – Appellant
Versus
Sh. Abhishek Kumar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the review application and procedural details. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 10) |
| 2. discussion on the nature of review and its limitations. (Para 4 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. arguments related to the intermediary's liability. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. clarification of the review process and its distinct nature from appeals. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. outcome of the review application. (Para 18) |
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, PRESIDENT
1. The present review application has been filed by the review applicant for reviewing the impugned judgment and order dated 02-04-2025 passed by the bench of the State Commission in Appeal No.74 of 2025; Intercity Smart Bus Vs Abhishek Kumar Sahu inter-alia whereby the appeal filed by the review applicant was dismissed.
2. The office has reported a delay of 31 days in filing the review application. For condoning the same, an application supported by an affidavit has also been filed by the review applicant.
3. In view of order, which is proposed to be passed, we hereby dispense with notice to the opposite party/complainant herein.
4. By means of application dated 17-06-2025, the review applicant has prayed for condonation of delay of 31 da
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
