SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 6779

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
JUSTICE RAJ SHEKHAR ATTRI, PRESIDENT, MR. RAJESH K. ARYA, MEMBER
Eduonix Learning Solutions Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sh. Sehbaz Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sh. Dhawal Bhandari
For the Respondents:

Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - The court held that online educational services constitute commercial services under the Consumer Protection Act, allowing consumer complaints based on service transaction definitions. (!) (!) - The District Commission had jurisdiction; services provided by the appellant qualify as consumer services under the Act. (!) (!) - Complaint proceedings awarded relief including loan clearance, refund, compensation for mental agony, and costs, with timelines and potential interest on delayed compliance. (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) - The appeal was dismissed at preliminary stage for lack of merit. (!)

What is the status of Eduonix Learning Solutions Private Limited as a service provider under the Consumer Protection Act in online education?

What is the jurisdiction of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (Chandigarh) to entertain this complaint concerning online educational services?

What are the grounds for hold and appeal in this case regarding maintainability and classification of online learning as a commercial service?


BEFORE: JUSTICE RAJ SHEKHAR ATTRI, PRESIDENT MR. RAJESH K. ARYA, MEMBER Argued by:- Sh. Dhawal Bhandari, Advocate for the appellant.

PER RAJESH K. ARYA, MEMBER This appeal has been filed by opposite party No.1, namely, Eduonix Learning Solutions Private Limited (appellant herein) assailing order dated 10.03.2025 vide which, the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-I, U.T., Chandigarh (in short ‘District Commission’) has partly allowed the consumer complaint bearing No.196 of 2024 in the following manner:-

“10. In view of the above discussion, the present consumer complaint succeeds and the same is accordingly partly allowed. OPs are jointly and severally directed as under:-

i) To clear the loan account of the complainant without charging anything from the complainant.

ii) To refund Rs.2500/- to the complainant with interest @ 9% p.a. from the date of deposit till onwards after deducting Rs.1000/- as administrative charges.

iii) to pay 10,000/- to the complainant as compensation for causing mental agony and harassment;

iv) to pay 7000/- to the complainant as costs of litigation.

11. This order be complied with by the OPs jointly and severally within a period of 45 days from the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top