STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
KALYANI KAPSE, PRESIDING MEMBER, SHAILA D. WANDHARE, MEMBER
THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
PRAGYA WD/O PRADIP SIRAS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for condonation of delay (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. response and contestation by respondent (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's decision to allow condonation (Para 5) |
ORDER
1. Applicant namely Oriental Insurance company Ltd. Chandrapur filed the instant appeal alongwith application for condonation of delay against the order and judgement dated 6/2/2023 passed by Ld.District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chandrapur in consumer Complaint No.CC/133/2019.
2. Applicant, in his application contended that due to procedural formalities of the appellant company the delay has been caused in preferring appeal. It is contended that intimation of order was communicated by the dealing advocate to the Branch Office in the third week of February,2023. The Branch Office after receipt of certified copy in the first week of March,2023, forwarded the office record alongwith order to the Divisional Office at Nagpur. Thereafter it was sent tothe Regional Office to take decision whether to satisfy the award or to prefer an appeal. Applicant further contended that if the delay caused in preferring appeal is not condoned the appellant would be denied the opportunity to contest the matter on m
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.