STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Mrs. Justice Daya Chaudhary, President, Ms. Simarjot Kaur, Member, Mr. Vishav Kant Garg, Member
Rajneesh Garg – Appellant
Versus
Raja Motors Hyundai – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. complaint regarding the purchase and defects of a vehicle. (Para 5) |
SIMARJOT KAUR, MEMBER
By this common order of ours, the above said two First Appeals i.e. First Appeal No.732 of 2024 titled as “Rajneesh Garg Vs. Raja Motors & Ors.”, filed by the Appellant/Complainant and First Appeal No.738 of 2024 titled as “Raja Motors Vs. Rajneesh Garg & Ors.” filed by the Appellant/OP No.1 shall be disposed off/decided by the common order as same questions of law and facts involved therein.
2 FA No.732 of 2024 has been filed by the Appellant/Complainant under Section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (in short ‘The Act’) being aggrieved by the impugned Order dated 07.10.2024 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Patiala (in short ‘the District Commission’) whereby the Complaint of the Complainant had been disposed off. FA No.738 of 2024 has been filed by the OP No.1 being aggrieved by the order dated 07.10.2024.
3. The facts are being extracted from FA No.732 of 2024 titled as “Rajneesh Garg Vs. Raja Motors & Ors.”, filed by the Appellant/Complainant.
4. It would be apposite to mention that hereinafter the parties will be referred, as had been a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.