SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 8340

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
FIITJEE LTD. – Appellant
Versus
SMT. SANGEETA GOYAL – Respondent


IN THE DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION Date of Institution: 22.08.2022 Date of Hearing: 24.07.2024 Date of Decision: 22.11.2024 FIRST APPEAL NO.-141/2022 IN THE MATTER OF FIITJEE LTD., 29-A, KALU SARAI, SARVPRIYA VIHAR, NEW DELHI – 110016 THROUGH IT’S A.R.

SH. SHIV CHARAN …Appellant (Through: RG LAWZ, Advocates & Consultants)

VERSUS SMT. SANGEETA GOYAL W/o SH. SUNIL GOYAL, R/o B-50, SECTOR-14, NOIDA - 201301 ….Respondent (Through: Ms. Tanya Raizada, Advocate CORAM:

HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, PRESIDENT HON’BLE Ms. PINKI, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

HON’BLE Mr. J.P. AGRAWAL, MEMBER (GENERAL)

Present: Ms. Musarrat, Counsel for Appellant (Enrl. No. D-9452/2023, Email : officecofrqlaws@gmail.com, Mob No. 9810910312).

Ms. Tanya Raizada, Counsel for Respondent (Ph. No. 8376899834, email ID: tanyaraizada1994@gmail.com & Enrl.

No. D/5986/2017).

PER: MR. J.P. AGRAWAL, MEMBER (GENERAL)

JUDGMENT

1. The facts of the case as per the District Commission record are:

“1.Facts of the Case as pleaded by Complainant are:-

Complainant‟s daughter got enrolled in a 02 year programme with FIITJEE(OP-1) on 29.01.2008, while she was preparing for her Class X Board Exam.

2. It is stated that at the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top