STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
DR.SRIKANTH PANDEY, PRESIDING MEMBER, DR. MONIKA MALIK, MEMBER
RAMESH KUMAR PANDIT – Appellant
Versus
COMMERCIAL AUTOMOBILE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. grounds for delay application. (Para 3) |
| 2. evaluation of reasons for appeal delay. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. criteria for condoning delay in appeals. (Para 6 , 7) |
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION MADHYA PRADESH FIRST APPEAL NO. SC/23/FA/80/2025 (Against the Order dated 30th January 2024 in Complaint DC/411/RBT/CC/549/2014 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Jabalpur)
RAMESH KUMAR PANDIT PRESENT ADDRESS - JABALPURJABALPUR,MADHYA PRADESH.
.......Appellant(s)
Versus COMMERCIAL AUTOMOBILE PRESENT ADDRESS - JABALPURJABALPUR,MADHYA PRADESH.
.......Respondent(s)
BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. DR.SRIKANTH PANDEY , PRESIDING MEMBER HON'BLE MRS. DR. MONIKA MALIK , MEMBER FOR THE APPELLANT:
RAMESH KUMAR PANDIT FOR THE RESPONDENT:
COMMERCIAL AUTOMOBILE DATED: 27/05/2025
ORDER
M. P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BHOPAL PLOT NO.76, ARERA HILLS, BHOPAL FIRST APPEAL NO. 80 OF 2025 (Arising out of order dated 30.01.2024 passed in C.C.No.549/2014 by District Commission, Jabalpur-1)
RAMESH KUMAR PANDIT. … APPELLANT Versus COMMERCIAL AUTOMOBILES PVT.LTD. & ANR. … RESPONDENTS.
BEFORE:
HON'BLE DR. SRIKANT PANDEY : PRESIDING MEMBER HON’BLE DR. (MRS) MONIKA MALIK : MEMBER O R
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.