SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 9400

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
M/s. Margadarshi Chit Fund Pvt Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
M. Ravi Kumar – Respondent


BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.

F.A.No.642 OF 2019 AGAINST ORDERS IN C.C.123/2016 DISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSION, RANGA REDDY Between:

M/s Margadarsi Chit Fund Pvt., Ltd., 17-85, 1st Floor, Annapurna Complex, Gaddiannaram, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad-500 060, Rep. by its Branch Manager.

………..Appellant/Opposite Party And:

M.Ravi Kumar, S/o Late M.Srinivas Rao, Aged about 51 years, Occ.: Business, R/o Flat No.104, Block No.1, Shubha Lakshmi Apartments, RD No.3, Green Hills Colony, Saroornagar, R.R.Dist.-500 035. …..Respondent/Complainant Counsel for the Appellant/Opposite Party : M/s R.Chankradhar Counsel for the Respondent/Complainant : M/s A.Naveen Kumar QUORUM :

HON’BLE SMT. MEENA RAMANATHAN, I/c PRESIDENT &

HON’BLE SRI. V.V.SESHUBABU, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

TUESDAY, THE 1st DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND TWENTY FOUR **********

Order : (PER HON’BLE SRI. V.V.SESHUBABU, MEMBER JUDICIAL)

1. The appeal is filed u/s 15 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by the Opposite Party, aggrieved by the order of District Consumer Commission, Ranga Reddy, dated 25.09.2019 in CC 123/2016, where under the opposite party was directed to return the amount of Rs.1,65,000/- alo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top