SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 13041

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
The Secunderabad Coop. Urban Bank Limited – Appellant
Versus
Mumtaz Begum – Respondent


BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.

F.A. No.38 OF 2023 AGAINST ORDERS IN C.C.79/2021 DISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSION-III, HYDERABAD Between:

The Secunderabad Co-op. Urban Bank Limited, Rep. by it’s Branch Manager, D.No.1-4-909, Main Road, Mushirabad, Hyderabad -500080.

………..Appellant/ Opposite Party And:

Mumtaz Begum, W/o Syed Mustafa, Aged about 62 years, Occ.: Household, R/o 11-3-354/36, Parsigutta, Secunderabad.

……..Respondent/Complainant Counsel for the Appellant/Opposite Party : M/s. Mir Masood Khan Counsel for the Respondent/Complainant : Party-in-Person QUORUM :

HON’BLE SMT. MEENA RAMANATHAN, I/c PRESIDENT &

HON’BLE SRI. V.V.SESHUBABU, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

WEDNESDAY, THE 1st DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND TWENTY FOUR **********

Order : (PER HON’BLE SRI. V.V.SESHUBABU, MEMBER JUDICIAL)

1. The appeal is filed U/s 41 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 by the Opposite Party, aggrieved by the order of District Consumer Commission-III, Hyderabad, dated 07.11.2022 in CC 79/2021 where under the opposite party was directed to handover the re-created copy of title deed No.1986/1985 along with certified copy to the complainant with immediate effect; to pay Rs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top