STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Sh. Shyo Ram Dhanial. – Appellant
Versus
Himachal Pradesh Gramin Bank. – Respondent
H. P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION SHIMLA.
First Appeal No.: 32/2022 Date of Presentation: 13.04.2022 Reserved on: 08.05.2024 Date of Decision: 15.05.2024 ………………………………………………………………………
Shyo Ram Dhanial S/o late Sh. Nanak Chand, Proprietor Palak Enterprises, Una Road, Near Himalyan Dhaba, Amb, Tehsil Amb, District Una, H.P.
…....... Appellant/Complainant.
Versus Himachal Pradesh Gramin Bank, Branch Amb, Tehsil Amb, District Una, H.P., through its Branch Manager.
.......... Respondent/Opposite Party.
………………………………………………………………………
Coram Hon’ble Justice Inder Singh Mehta, President.
Hon’ble Mr. R.K. Verma, Member.
1 Whether approved for reporting? Yes.
For the Appellant: Mr.Sahil Thakur, Advocate vice Mr.
Parveen Chandel, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Arvind Kumar Rattan, Advocate.
………………………………………………………………………
Justice Inder Singh Mehta, President
O R D E R:
Present appeal is preferred against the order dated 21.09.2021 of learned District Commission Una, in consumer complaint No.94/2017 titled Shyo Ram Versus Himachal Pradesh Gramin Bank, whereby, the complaint filed by the complainant was dismissed.
Brief facts of t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.