SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 18070

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Shri Dr. Yeshu nanda – Appellant
Versus
Sri Durga Charan Gehlot – Respondent


BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.

F.A.No.240 OF 2020 AGAINST ORDERS IN C.C.380/2017 DISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSION-II, HYDERABAD.

Between:

Shri Dr.Yeshu Nanda, S/o Shri Joginder Singh Nanda, Aged about 56 years, Occ.: Business, R/o Flat No.204, Mithila Homes, Road No.3, Haripuri Colony, Saroornagar, R.R.District.

Rep. by his S.P.A. Holder, Shri Harsih Kumar Tandra, S/o Shri Prakash Rao, Tandra, Aged about 47 years, Occ.: Business, R/o Flat No.303, Silver Oke Apartments, Ganga Enclave, Kompally, Hyderabad.

Ranga Reddy District.

…….Appellant/Complainant And:

Sri Durga Charan Gehlot, Advocate, R.G. Associates, At 6-3-678/1/A, Durga Nagar Colony, Panjagutta, Hyderabad-530 082.

……..Respondent/Opposite Party Counsel for the Appellant/Complainant : M/s V.Gouri Sankara Rao.

Counsel for the Respondent/Opposite Party : Called absent.

QUORUM :

HON’BLE SMT. MEENA RAMANATHAN, I/c PRESIDENT &

HON’BLE SRI. V.V.SESHUBABU, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

TUESDAY, THE 3 0th DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND TWENTY FOUR **********

Order : (PER HON’BLE SRI. V.V.SESHUBABU, MEMBER JUDICIAL)

1. The appeal is filed u/s 15 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986, by the complainant, aggrieved by the dism

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top