SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 18953

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Shri.Samir Patel – Appellant
Versus
M/s ICICI Bank Ltd. – Respondent


BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.

F.A.No. 350 OF 2023 AGAINST ORDERS IN C.C.369/2022 DISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSION-III, HYDERABAD Between:

Shri Samir Patel, S/o Naren Patel, Age : 58 years, Occupation : Business, R/o Plot No.41, Surya Enclave, Trimulgherry, Secunderabad-15.

…….Appellant/Complainant And:

1. M/s ICICI Bank Ltd., Represented by it’s Managing Director and CEO, Having it’s office at Landmark, Racecourse Circle, Vadodara-390007, Having it’s Corporate Office at Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai-400 051.

2. M/s ICICI Bank Ltd., Diamond Point Branch, Sikh Village, Secunderabad-500 009.

……..Respondents/Opposite Parties Counsel for the Appellant/Complainant : Sri Karoor Mohan Counsel for the Respondents /Opposite Parties No.1 & 2 :

M/s S.Nagesh Reddy QUORUM :

HON’BLE SMT. MEENA RAMANATHAN, I/c PRESIDENT &

HON’BLE SRI. V.V.SESHUBABU, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

TUESDAY, THE 24th D AY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND TWENTY FOUR **********

Order : (PER HON’BLE SRI. V.V.SESHUBABU, MEMBER JUDICIAL)

1. The appeal is filed u/s 41 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, by the complainant, aggrieved by the order of District Consumer Commission-III, Hyderabad, dated 19.04

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top