STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Shri.Samir Patel – Appellant
Versus
M/s ICICI Bank Ltd. – Respondent
BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.
F.A.No. 350 OF 2023 AGAINST ORDERS IN C.C.369/2022 DISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSION-III, HYDERABAD Between:
Shri Samir Patel, S/o Naren Patel, Age : 58 years, Occupation : Business, R/o Plot No.41, Surya Enclave, Trimulgherry, Secunderabad-15.
…….Appellant/Complainant And:
1. M/s ICICI Bank Ltd., Represented by it’s Managing Director and CEO, Having it’s office at Landmark, Racecourse Circle, Vadodara-390007, Having it’s Corporate Office at Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai-400 051.
2. M/s ICICI Bank Ltd., Diamond Point Branch, Sikh Village, Secunderabad-500 009.
……..Respondents/Opposite Parties Counsel for the Appellant/Complainant : Sri Karoor Mohan Counsel for the Respondents /Opposite Parties No.1 & 2 :
M/s S.Nagesh Reddy QUORUM :
HON’BLE SMT. MEENA RAMANATHAN, I/c PRESIDENT &
HON’BLE SRI. V.V.SESHUBABU, MEMBER – (JUDICIAL)
TUESDAY, THE 24th D AY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND TWENTY FOUR **********
Order : (PER HON’BLE SRI. V.V.SESHUBABU, MEMBER – JUDICIAL)
1. The appeal is filed u/s 41 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, by the complainant, aggrieved by the order of District Consumer Commission-III, Hyderabad, dated 19.04
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.