SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 20075

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Managing Director Indusind Bank Ltd & Others. – Appellant
Versus
Bhanja Kishore Sahoo – Respondent
SC/21/RP/34/2023



"rl BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION: ODISHA : CUTTACK R.P No.... 1..?......oF 2023 (Arising out of the Interim Order dtd. L4/O2/2O23 passed by tl're Learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kendrapara, in I.A Case No. 13 / 2023, arising out of C.C Case No. 27 / 2023)

I I IN THE MATTER OF i I I A Revision Petition U/s. 47(1)(b) of the Consumer I l Protection Act,2019 & the rules made there under. I i AND

1 t IN THE MATTER OF ; I

1) MANAGING DIRECTOR, INDUSIND I BANK LTD., Regd. Office At- 2407, Gen. ,:)-e c, (E I () c Thimmaya Road (East Street), Pune- 411001. :1- a\ ED il .HAi 4 'ortt, 2) BRANCH MANAGER, INDUSIND BANK l

10';

LTD., At- Bajrakabati Road, P.O- Buxi Bazar, -,F'C1 c) l Dist.- Cuttack, Pin- 753001. =ELfF J { - +E!

ui-l-.(d

3) BRANCH MANAGER, INDUSIND BANK 13 -( .l .EJ i LTD., At- IFFCO Chhak (Near TVS Show-room), 9,.-i d n'

P.O/P.S- Paradeep, Dist.- Jagatsinghpur. :i PL- ll\- l The petitioners are represented through --I its Power of Attorney Holder of the Bank Sri Pradipta Das, aged about 30 years S/o-Subhas Chandra Das, At Present working as Dy Manager, Legal, Indusind Bank Ltd., Manorama Estate, Manorama Chambers, Plot-107, 1't Floor, Bomikhal, Near Rasulgarh Square, Bhubaneswar, Pin-7 51010.

PETITIONERS Vrs.

BHANJA KISHORE SAHOO, S/O-

Natabar Sahoo, Nayak, At/P.O- Madhuban, P.S- Paradeep, Dist.- Jagatsinghpur , Odisha. At Present :- At- Korapanga, P.S- Gatanai, P.S-

Marshaghai, Dist.- Kendrapara.

OPPOSITE PARTY ... Page 1 of 6 \ :

nP. Gt-r0uLr,* , NOIARV )

33t2tJ, .'r,?Tacr "owr.i

S1. No. of Order ORDER WITH SIGNATURE ffice note as to action (if any), taken on Order
tl..ttl No. 34 Heard the learned counsel submitted that the copy of the inspite of several requests. ln defects are removed. Learned counsel for the p 2. they have challenged the order was passed by the learned Kendrapara U/S 3S(8) of Consu (hereinafter called "the Act"). learned District Commission with O.P and without hearing the O. order as if disposed of the c submitted that the impugned without going through the facts case. Therefore, he filed the pre set aside the impugned order d the O.P to participate in the petition. -l l_* 2023 for the petitioner. He rder has not available uch circumstances the titioner submitted that ted 14.02.2023 which District Commission, r Protection Act, 2019 According to him the t issuing notice to the passed the impugned plaint case. He also rder has been passed nd issues involved the nt revision petition to L4.02.2023 and allow earing of the interim
OGF ili, l,lP iF.1 .,
ORDER WITH SIGNATURE Office note as to action (if any). taken on Order Perused the impugned sed by the learned District ference:- xxx s shall not repossess the vehicle oll not take any coercive action sal of C.C.No,27/2023 olong with directed to pay Rs.5,78,700/' which O.Ps misopproPrioted ive of this order. Failure of which he provision of execution in ', the R.T.O, Cuttock directed not b AD 05 AH 8577 till disPosol of Case No.27/2023. Put uP on .ps and to file obiection if anY." porties for comPliance of this that same bas been Passed ,2}lg.lt shows that the order appearance of the O.P. The comPlaint t as if Therefore, we t aside the said imPugned
3. Considered the submis order. The impugned order Commission is as follows for "Xxx tt is hereby directed that, the O beo ring No.OD-05-AH-8577 ond ogainst the comploinont till d, the O.Ps l.A No.11/2023.Further with interest to the comPlai, illegally within 75 daYs from the O.Ps sholl lioble under C.P.Act,2079. Further it is directed the O.P.no. to tronsfer the ownershiP of veh, tA No.11/2023 os well os C. dt.15.03.2023 for oPPeoronce of lssue extroct of order to i ' order." The above order clearlY s 4. purportedly U/S 38(8) of C.P has been passed exParte tenor of the order shows disposed of after hearing of t with the impugned order and
/ f-.

S1. No. of Order ORDE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top