BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD RP No.16 8/2022 AGAINST THE ORDERS IN C.C.No.605/2021, DISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSION-II, HYDERABAD Between:

M/s Samsung India Electronics Private Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director, Having its Office at Gummidelli Towers, Old Patigadda, Prakashnagar Metro, Hyderabad. …Appellant/ Opposite Party No.2 And:

1. Manish Sachdeva, S/o Sri Jatinder, Aged 35 years, Occ.: Business, R/o Himayatnagar, Hyderabad, 3-5-584/1, Kumar Vaasa, Near AIR Bus APTS: ST 16, Vittalwadi, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad.

….Respondent No.1/ Complainant

2. M/s Reliance Digital, Rep. by its Manager, Having its Office at MPM Mall, Himayatnagar, Hyderabad.

…..Respondent No.2/Opposite Party No.1.

Counsel for Appellant/Opposite Party No.2 : M/s Bhaskar Poluri.

Counsel for Respondent No.1/Complainant : Party-in-Person Counsel for Respondent No.2/Opposite Party No.1 : Called Absent.

QUORUM:

HON’BLE SMT. MEENA RAMANATHAN, IN-CHARGE PRESIDENT &

HON’BLE SRI K. RANGA RAO, MEMBER-JUDICIAL FRIDAY, THE FIF TH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND TWENTY THREE ******

1. The R.P. No.168/2022 is filed by the Appellant/Opposite Party No.2, U/s 41 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019, praying this Commission to (i) to set aside the exparte Docket Orders, dated 24.03.2022 in C.C.No.605/2021 on the file of the District Consumer Commission-II, Hyderabad; (ii) to pass orders directing the DCC-II, Hyderabad to receive the Written Version, Evidence Affidavit and also Written Arguments of the Appellant herein and (iii) to order further order or orders that are deemed fit and necessary under the circumstances of the case.

2. In view of the dismissal of delay petition vide R.P.IA No.1454/2022, this Revision Petition is rejected.

________SD/-__________SD/-______

I/C PRESIDENT MEMBER-J Date: 05.05.2023 *AD BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD RP.IA.No.1454 OF 202 2 in RP No.168/2022 AGAINST THE ORDERS IN CC.No.605/2021, DISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSION-II, HYDERABAD Between:

M/s Samsung India Electronics Private Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director, Having its Office at Gummidelli Towers, Old Patigadda, Prakashnagar Metro, Hyderabad. …Petitioner/Appellant/ Opposite Party No.2 And:

1. Manish Sachdeva, S/o Sri Jatinder, Aged 35 years, Occ.: Business, R/o Himayatnagar, Hyderabad.

….Respondent No.1/ Complainant

2. M/s Reliance Digital, Rep. by its Manager, Having its Office at MPM Mall, Himayatnagar, Hyderabad.

……..Respondent No.2/Opposite Party No.1.

Counsel for Appellant/Opposite Party No.2 : M/s Bhaskar Poluri.

Counsel for Respondent No.1/Complainant : Party-in-Person Counsel for Respondent No.2/Opposite Party No.1 : Called Absent.

QUORUM:

HON’BLE SMT. MEENA RAMANATHAN, IN-CHARGE PRESIDENT &

HON’BLE SRI K. RANGA RAO, MEMBER-JUDICIAL FRIDAY, THE FIF TH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND TWENTY THREE ******

1. This Interlocutory Application, vide R.P.IA No.1454/2022 in R.P. No.168/2022 is filed by the Petitioner/Opposite Party No.2 U/s 41 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019, R/w Section 151 of C.P.C., for condoning the delay of 78 days in filing the Revision Petition.

2. The Petitioner/Opposite Party No.2 in his given affidavit submitted that the Petitioner/Opposite Party No.2 received Notice in the main C.C.605/2021 on the file of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-II, Hyderabad on 24.11.2021. The Petitioner/Opposite Party No.2 instructed their counsel to appear and file the Vakalath. The said Vakalath was filed on 24.12.2021. A draft written version was sent by the counsel for the approval & signature and the same was processed and returned to the counsel for filing before the Commission. There was a delay in transit of the same. In the meanwhile, the prescribed 45 days were over and the Hon’ble District Commission-II, Hyderabad was pleased to set petitioner/Opposite Party No.2 exparte on 24.03.2022. There is a delay of 78 days in filing Revision Petition. If the Docket Order, dated 24.03.2022 passed by the Dis