SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 21070

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
M/s. Gagan Resources Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
United India Insurance Co. Ltd & Anr – Respondent
SC/22/CC/19/18



Petitioner Advocates:Shri R.K.Bhawnani ,Respondent Advocate: Shri P.K. Paul

AFR / NAFR CHHATTISGARH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION PANDRI, RAIPUR Date of Institution: 16/04/2019 Date of Final Hearing: 04/05/2023 Date of Pronouncement: 30/05/2023 COMPLAINT CASE No.- CC/2019/18 IN THE MATTER OF :

M/s. Gagan Resources Private Limited, Through: Authorized Signatory Rohit Raman S/o. Shri Ashok Kumar Mishra, Regd. Office – Govind Kunj, Ram Nath Bhimsen Marg, Near Krishna Talkies, Samta Colony, RAIPUR (C.G.) – 492 001 Through: Shri R.K. Bhawnani, Advocate … Complainant.

Vs.

1. United India Insurance Company Limited, Through: Divisional Manager, No.153, First Floor, Guru Arcade, Zone-1, Maharana Pratap Nagar, BHOPAL (M.P.) – 462 011 … Opposite Party No.1

2. United India Insurance Company Limited, Through: Divisional Manager, Divisional Office Krishna Complex, Kutchery Chowk, RAIPUR (C.G.)

… Opposite Party No.2 Both Through: Shri P.K. Paul, Advocate CORAM: -

HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE GAUTAM CHOURDIYA, PRESIDENT HON’BLE SHRI GOPAL CHANDRA SHIL, MEMBER HON’BLE SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR VARMA, MEMBER PRESENT: -

Shri R.K. Bhawnani, Advocate for the complainant.

Shri P.K. Paul, Advocate for the opposite parties.

JUDGEMENT

PER: - JUSTICE GAUTAM CHOURDIYA, PRESIDENT This complaint, under section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act” for short) has been filed by the complainant alleging unfair trade practice and deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties in not paying the amount of its insurance claim and seeking directions to them for payment of loss suffered due to spontaneous combustion in the sponge iron stock of Rs.29,70,000/- (Twenty Nine Lacs Seventy Thousand) along with interest @ 18% p.a. from the date of incident i.e. 06.04.2018 and compensation for mental agony to the complainant Rs.5,00,000/- (Five Lacs) cause due to unfair trade practice, deficiency in service committed by the opposite parties. Cost of litigation along with any other relief which this Commission deems fit to award have also been sought.

2. In nutshell the facts of the case are that the complainant obtained a Standard Fire and Special Perils Policy on 16.02.2018 vide policy No.1911001117P116664971 covering the risk for the period between 18:00 hrs of 16.02.2018 to 15.02.2019 midnight and paid premium of Rs.34,909.00 including the three add-on covers of earthquake, STFI Cover, spontaneous combustion. The opposite parties covered the complainant‟s sponge iron plant situated at Vill. Munrethi, Siltara, Dharsiva, Raipur (C.G.) 493221 particularly the building including boundary wall, plant & machinery, raw material, stock in process, stock of sponge / coal and finished goods. On 06.04.2018 there was heavy storm/ tempest/ flood/ inundation in Raipur, which continued even on 07.04.2018, in support of which newspaper reports‟ cuttings have been filed. As per the complainant due to said storm/ tempest the sheets of the shed blown away and rain water entered in the bunker where the sponge iron was stocked. When the rain water came into contact with the sponge iron due to chemical reaction (spontaneous combustion) the sponge iron stock was damaged. Immediately the incident was intimated to the opposite parties through email dated 07.04.2018 and the insurance broker through which the policy was obtained and the insurance company was requested to register claim and appoint a surveyor.

3. Thereafter on 14.04.2018 the complainant filed duly filled fire insurance claim form, Annexure A-3. In turn the opposite party insurance company deputed Mr. Rajiv Dausage as surveyor to conduct survey of the insured property and to assess the loss, who in turn inspected the insured property and the damaged stock, collected samples and asked the complainant to submit certain documents. As requested by the surveyor, the complainant submitted all the requisite documents including a copy of the insurance policy, claim form, paper cutting, estimate of loss, closing stock, costing of material, annual reports with balance sheets f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top