STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
S.Vidya Madurai. – Appellant
Versus
M/s.HDFC ERGO General Insurance Company Ltd. HDFCHouse 1 st Floor Mumbai. – Respondent
IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH OF THE TAMILNADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MADURAI.
Present: THIRU. S.KARUPPIAH, PRESIDING JUDICIAL MEMBER C.C.No.39/2017 Date of complaint filed : 17.08.2017 Date of orders pronounced : 04.08.2023 Smt.S.Vidya, W/o (Late) V.K.Suresh, B2/12, High Court Officers & Staff Quarters, Mattuthavani, Madurai – 625 007. Complainant -Vs-
M/s.HDFC ERGO General Insurance Company Limited, HDFC House, 1st Floor, 165-166 Back bay Reclamation, H.T.Parekh Marg, Church gate, Mumbai – 400 020. Opposite Party Counsel for Complainant : Mr.S.Mahesh Babu, Advocate.
Counsel for Opposite Party : Mr.S.Suresh, Advocate.
This complaint came before me for final hearing on 02.08.2023 and upon perusing the material records this Commission made the following:-
ORDER
THIRU.S.KARUPPIAH, PRESIDING JUDICIAL MEMBER.
1. The complainant’s case :
The complainant’s husband one V.K.Suresh since deceased obtained a ‘Home Suraksha Plus Policy’ with the opposite party on 30.03.2013 and it is valid up to 17.01.2017. A premium of Rs.91,553/- was also paid. The complainant’s husband was working as Sub Assistant Registrar of Madurai Bench of Madras High Court. The complainant husband took treatment
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.