SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 21700

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
R.Rakesh – Appellant
Versus
More Retail Ltd. – Respondent


BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.

FA.NO.22 OF 2023 AGAINST ORDERS IN CC.NO. 67/2021, DISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSION- ADILABAD Between: R.Rakesh, Aged about: 24 years, Occ: Private Employee, R/o.H.No.14-228, Ramakrishnapur, Kyathanapally, Mandamarri Mandal, Adilabad District. T.S.

.…Appellant/Complainant And

1. More Retail Ltd., Mancherial, Gr.floor, D.No.13-202 to 13-212, Srinivasa Complex, Caltex, Petrol Pump, Adilabad District, T.S.

2. More Retail Ltd., (Head Office), Skyline Icon-86/92, 5th & 6th floor, Near Mittal Industrial Estate, Andheri, Kurla Road, Mumbai, M.H. 400059.

…..Respondents/Opposite Parties Counsel for the Appellant/Complainant: M/s.V.Shiva Shankar Babu Counsel for the Respondents/Opp. Parties: M/s. Sridhar Boyapalli QUORAM:

HON’BLE SMT.MEENA RAMANATHAN…IN-CHARGE PRESIDENT &

HON’BLE SRI K.RANGA RAO,…MEMBER-JUDICIAL FRIDAY, THE ELEVEN TH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND TWENTY THREE ******* Order :

1. This is an appeal filed U/s.41 of Consumer Protection Act,2019, praying this Commission allow the appeal and allow the complaint in CC.No.67 of 2021 dated 07.09.2022 on the file of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at Adilab

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top