SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 22381

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Smt. Heera Sharma – Appellant
Versus
HDFC ERGO Health Insurance Ltd.(formerly known as Apollo Munich Health Insurance Co. Ltd.) – Respondent
SC/5/CC/2/2021



Cause Title/Judgement-Entry
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,UTTARAKHAND
23/16, Circular Road, Dalanwala, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248001
Dehradun-248001
Final Order
 
Complaint Case No. CC/2/2021
( Date of Filing : 22 Apr 2021 )
 
1. Smt. Heera Sharma
s/o late Sunil Kumar Sharma, r/o Dwarikapuri Purv, Gas Godam Road,Kusumkhera, Haldwani
Nainital
Uttarakhand
2. Kamlesh Sharma
s/o late Sh. Sunil Kumar Sharma r/o r/o Dwarikapuri Purv, Gas Godam Road,Kusumkhera, Haldwani
Nainital
Uttarakhand
3. Rahul Sharma
s/o late Sunil Kumar Sharma r/o r/o Dwarikapuri Purv, Gas Godam Road,Kusumkhera, Haldwani
Nainital
Uttarakhand
4. Ms. Renu Sharma
d/o late Sunil Kumar Sharma r/o Dwarikapuri Purv, Gas Godam Road,Kusumkhera, Haldwani
Nainital
Uttarakhand
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. HDFC ERGO Health Insurance Ltd.(formerly known as Apollo Munich Health Insurance Co. Ltd.)
reg. & Corporate office Ist floor, HDFC House ,Backbay Reclamation H.T. R Pareks Marg, Churchgate
Mumbai
Maharsthra
2. HDFC ERGO Health Insurance Ltd.(formerly known as Apollo Munich Health Insurance Co. Ltd.)
2nd floor, ,116 Civil Lines ICICI Bank Blog, Bareilly through its Branch Manager,
Bareilly
Uttar Pradesh
3. Sh. Prakash Chandra Bhatt
s/o not known r/o 9/144 Savitri Colony, Bareily Road, Haldwani , Nainital , agent HDFC Health Insurance Ltd. (formerly known as Apollo Munich Health Insu. Ltd.
Nainital
Uttarakhand
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.S. Tripathi PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Udai Singh Tolia MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 19 Sep 2023
Final Order / Judgement

Case is called out.

Sh. Vaibhav Jain, learned counsel for the complainants and Sh. Suresh Gautam, learned counsel for opposite party Nos. 1 & 2, are present.  None is present on behalf of opposite party No. 3, although service of notice upon opposite party No. 3 has already been held to be sufficient by way of refusal.

An application has been moved on behalf of the complainants to withdraw this consumer complaint, with permission to file fresh consumer complaint before the District Commission having jurisdiction to entertain and decide the same.

Learned counsel for opposite party Nos. 1 & 2 states that he has no objection, if the aforesaid application is allowed.

Accordingly, the application is allowed.  The consumer complaint is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the complainants to file fresh consumer complaint before the District Commission having jurisdiction in the matter.

Let the record be consigned.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.S. Tripathi]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Udai Singh Tolia]
MEMBER
 
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top